Enacted in 1979 (B.E. 2522), the Consumer Protection Act establishes Thailand’s fundamental legal protections for consumers in the commercial marketplace. The law arose from the need to address information asymmetry, abusive contractual terms, and unsafe or deceptive goods and services in a rapidly industrializing economy.
Its objectives are:
To ensure consumers are not misled by advertisements
To mandate transparency in labeling and trade practices
To regulate the fairness of standard contracts
To provide institutional channels for administrative and legal redress
The Act establishes a layered regulatory framework:
Policy-making and high-level supervision body
Chaired by the Prime Minister or appointed minister
Approves regulations, investigates major cases, and can refer criminal complaints
Operational agency handling complaint intake, investigation, and coordination
Submits proposed ministerial regulations for approval
Collaborates with police and prosecutors when violations involve criminal liability
Handle specific subject matters: Advertising, Labels, and Contract Terms
Authorized to issue ministerial notifications applicable to industry conduct
(Sections 22–31 of the Act)
Prohibits false, exaggerated, or misleading claims
Advertisements must not omit material facts or use technical jargon to confuse
Comparative advertising must be verifiable and non-defamatory
Administrative orders may compel retraction or correction
Criminal liability for non-compliance includes fines and imprisonment
(Sections 32–39)
Mandatory information on consumer goods includes:
Product name and category
Manufacturer/importer information
Instructions for use
Warnings and expiry dates
Label must be in Thai, prominently displayed, and approved when necessary
Applies particularly to food, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and cosmetics
(Section 35 bis – quinquies)
Applies to standard-form contracts used in asymmetrical business relationships (e.g., landlords, insurers, lenders)
Contracts must be submitted for approval when subject to regulation
Unfair clauses may be declared void if they create an excessive imbalance
Mandatory contract clauses and prohibited provisions are issued via notifications
Mechanism | Legal Basis | Scope |
---|---|---|
Administrative orders | CPB or OCPB may suspend advertisements, mandate labeling corrections, or order product recalls | |
Civil litigation | Victims may seek compensation under tort principles in Civil and Commercial Code | |
Criminal prosecution | Fines and imprisonment under Penal Code and Consumer Protection Act for egregious violations | |
Product liability actions | Under the 2008 Product Liability Act, producers and importers face strict liability for defective goods |
Although separate from the Consumer Protection Act, the Product Liability Act B.E. 2551 (2008) enhances consumer protection by imposing non-fault-based liability on:
Manufacturers
Importers
Trademark owners
Sellers who cannot identify the producer
Claimants are not required to prove negligence—only defect and damage, including for personal injury and property loss.
Complaints may be lodged with the OCPB, sector-specific regulators, or provincial consumer boards
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) options such as mediation are increasingly utilized
Cases involving broader public harm may be prosecuted ex officio
Class actions are allowed under Thai law for certain consumer and securities-related claims, though relatively rare
Violation | Statutory Sanction |
---|---|
False advertising (Sec. 28) | Up to 6 months’ imprisonment or THB 100,000 fine |
Failure to display label | Up to 6 months’ imprisonment or THB 100,000 fine |
Use of unfair contract terms | Administrative nullification and civil consequences |
Repeat offenses or obstruction | Escalated fines, business license suspension, or criminal charges |
Public awareness: Many consumers are unaware of formal protections or enforcement channels
Enforcement bottlenecks: Delays in administrative processing and inter-agency coordination reduce deterrent impact
Digital commerce: Current laws struggle with overseas platforms, influencer marketing, and data privacy issues
Efforts are underway to amend the Act to cover cross-border transactions and online marketplaces, but such reforms remain pending.
Thailand’s Consumer Protection Act provides a multi-dimensional legal framework for safeguarding consumers against commercial abuse. While substantial protections exist across advertising, labeling, and contracting, effective enforcement depends on:
Regulatory capacity
Judicial accessibility
Public participation
As consumer transactions increasingly move online and across borders, the Act’s traditional mechanisms are under pressure to modernize. Future reforms must address these gaps while reinforcing the legal rights of consumers as equal parties in the Thai economic system.
Recent Comments